Apr 25, 2026 11:00am PT

Do Biopics Have a Double Standard? How ‘Michael’ Could Overcome Bad Reviews and See Awards Prospects for Jaafar Jackson

Clayton Davis

Plus Icon

Clayton Davis

Senior Awards Editor

byClaytonDavis

Latest

With Emmy Submissions Likely to Drop Again, Smaller Field Could Boost Dark Horse Series and Performers

2 days ago

David Harbour Sets Emmy Bid for ‘DTF St. Louis’ in Supporting Actor With Multiple Noms in Play (EXCLUSIVE)

2 days ago

‘Jury Duty: Company Retreat’ Submits 19 Actors for Emmys, Including Sia; Participant Anthony Norman Ineligible (EXCLUSIVE)

4 days ago

See All

Glen Wilson/Lionsgate

The verdict on “Michael” is in, and it is blunt.

A 38% Rotten Tomatoes score has landed with a familiar critique: The film avoids the most controversial chapters of Michael Jackson’s life. But with a projected $85 million or more global opening, the film has secured its place in the cultural zeitgeist, and the harsh reviews it suffered won’t doom its awards prospects.

Despite the critical lashing, the audience score has been propped up by faithful fans and is sitting at 96%. It’s worth going over some recent awards history to contextualize those numbers. Adam McKay’s allegorical satire “Don’t Look Up” (2021) was deemed rotten by critics, with a 55% Tomatometer, but earned an audience score of 78%. The film went on to land four Oscar nominations, including best picture and original screenplay. The Academy has nominated other movies with low critical consensus for best picture, including “Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close” (2011).

Do Biopics Have a Double Standard? How 'Michael' Could Overcome Bad Reviews and See Awards Prospects for Jaafar Jackson