The Alaskan permafrost is thawing. Here’s why that’s so worrying

April 1, 2026

2 min read

Add Us On GoogleAdd SciAm

The Alaskan permafrost is thawing. Here’s why that’s so worrying

A Wisconsin-sized region of frozen soil is thawing fast, releasing three trillion more gallons of water per year than it did just four decades ago

By Jackie Flynn Mogensen edited by Claire Cameron

Dead and slumping boreal forest Alaska birch trees rest in floodwaters amid thawing permafrost and snowmelt at Creamer’s Field in Fairbanks, Alaska, in 2023.

Mario Tama/Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Sign Up for Our Free Daily NewsletterEnter your email

I agree my information will be processed in accordance with the Scientific American and Springer Nature Limited Privacy Policy. We leverage third party services to both verify and deliver email. By providing your email address, you also consent to having the email address shared with third parties for those purposes.

Sign Up

Thawing permafrost is among climate science’s worst “positive feedback loops”: As the world warms, permafrost—essentially frozen soil—thaws, releasing fresh water and carbon into the environment. That release further fuels climate change, driving more warming. (Thawing permafrost has also raised concerns about unleashing new pathogens on humanity.)

And in Alaska, the loop seems to be speeding up. In a new study, researchers tracked how thawing permafrost in a Wisconsin-sized section of the North Slope region of Alaska has added fresh water and dissolved organic carbon to estuaries off the Alaskan coast between 1980 and 2023.

In more recent years, the region released nearly 12 cubic kilometers (three trillion gallons) per year, more water than it did from 1980 to 1984. That’s enough to fill more than 4.5 million Olympic swimming pools, estimates Michael Rawlins, lead author of the study and an extension associate professor of Earth, geographic and climate sciences at the University of Massachusetts Amherst.

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

Fresh water is a problem for the ocean—it disrupts sea ice formation, alters the salinity of coastal lagoons and bays, could threaten global ocean circulation and carries carbon that’s later released into the atmosphere.

From the early 1980s to 2023, the amount of carbon that northern Alaska’s rivers release into the ocean every year has risen from about 120 gigagrams to about 170 gigagrams—an increase of about 50,000 metric tons of carbon per year.

“Some of that carbon has been locked up for tens of thousands of years. It’s now thawed, mobilized in the rivers, gets to the ocean, where some of it becomes part of the atmosphere,” Rawlins says, comparing this to fossil fuel extraction. “Outgassing”—the release of methane or carbon dioxide—can happen from rivers directly before it reaches the ocean, too.

The study could help researchers better understand permafrost-fueled carbon emissions across the Arctic, a region that is warming about three times faster than the rest of the planet, scientists estimate.

“As we try to better understand the amount of carbon in the ocean, we need good estimates of the amount coming out of these rivers,” Rawlins says.

The findings were published on Wednesday in the journal Global Biogeochemical Cycles.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe